Dear David,

I have been following the threads of your posts, as I enjoy your
thoughts on paper. I followed the separation discussion between you
and Dan which gave me alot to ponder on separation mentally as
opposed to physical separations and whether and what separation means
etc., and the poor cow with Dan, Nathaniel, Tim which was a great
parable about our comfort zones.

Having said all that, you lost me in the first paragraph of this one
and with a few other ideas you put forth in the rest of the text and
wondered if you might be open to discussion on this? It is not my
intent to attack the post as these are your personal thoughts and
beliefs. I would like to discuss some of the points you made and
offer a different perspective. There are some great points of
discussion. Are you up for it?

love
Jeanne

Hello Jeanne,
I would be happy to further clarify as understanding is my purpose
and to leave you in confusion as a result of my communication hardly
achieves that purpose.

The further and further one journeys in the pursuit of truth and
understanding the more one has to explore uncharted territories,
unexamined truths and lies and all points of view that are considered
valid by any point of view. My purpose in doing this is peace,
freedom, knowledge and understanding for myself.

Anything that we perceive to be separate or outside of ourselves is
an area that we are not taking responsibility for. The greatest
freedoms seem to be available only in the most expanded or inclusive
viewpoints. All is a large concept, it includes both right and wrong,
good and bad, you and me, us and them. All is where freedom for the
individual is found, the union of the physical with limitless spirit
as the operating consciousness is what I was exploring in the Be
still post.

If we are divine beings in the eternal truth of ourselves, it seems
to me that bringing that eternal truth into the body is what the
making of a saint is.

Ask me any questions you wish and I will respond as well as I can.

Kind regards,

David